Monday, September 25, 2017
John Wesley interviews his mother
Monday, September 3, 1739. I talked largely with my mother, who told me that, till a short time since, she had scarcely heard such a thing mentioned as the having forgiveness of sins now, or God’s Spirit bearing witness with our spirit: much less did she imagine that this was the common privilege of all true believers. “Therefore,” said she, “I never durst ask for it myself. But two or three weeks ago, while my son Hall was pronouncing those words, in delivering the cup to me, ‘The blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, which was given for thee,’ the words struck through my heart and I knew God for Christ’s sake had forgiven me all my sins.” I asked whether her father (Dr. Annesley) had not the same faith and whether she had not heard him preach it to others. She answered that he had had it himself; and had declared, a little before his death, that for more than forty years he had had no darkness, no fear, no doubt at all of his being “accepted in the Beloved.” But that, nevertheless, she did not remember to have heard him preach, no, not once, explicitly upon it: whence she supposed he also looked upon it as the peculiar blessing of a few, not as promised to all the people of God.
Saturday, November 14, 2015
John Wesley's new birth ends nearly two decades of living “under the law”
John Wesley's journal, January 8, 1738: In the fullness of my heart, I wrote the
following words: - “By the most infallible of proofs,
inward feeling, I am convinced,
“1. Of unbelief; having no such faith in Christ as will
prevent my heart from being troubled; which it could not be, if I believed in
God, and rightly believed also in him:
“2. Of pride, throughout my life past; inasmuch as I thought
I had what I find I have not:
“3. Of gross irrecollection; inasmuch as in a storm I cry to
God every moment; in a calm, not:
“4. Of levity and luxuriancy of spirit, recurring whenever
the pressure is taken off, and appearing by my speaking words not tending to
edify; but most by my manner of speaking of my enemies.
“Lord, save, or I perish! Save me,
“1. By such a faith as implies peace in life and in death:
“2. By such humility, as may till my heart from this hour
for ever, with a piercing uninterrupted sense, Nihil est quod hactenus feci
(I have done nothing hitherto); having evidently built without a
foundation:
“3. By such a recollection as may cry to thee every moment,
especially when all is calm: Give me faith, or I die; give me a lowly spirit;
otherwise, mihi non sit suave vivere (Let life be a burden to me.)
“4. By steadiness, seriousness, sobriety of spirit;
avoiding, as fire, every word that tendeth not to edifying; and clever speaking
of any who oppose me, or sin against God, without all my own sins set in array
before my face.”
May 19, 1738: My brother had a second return of his
pleurisy. A few of us spent Saturday night in prayer. The next day, being
Whit-Sunday, after hearing Dr. Heylyn preach a truly Christian sermon, (on,
“They were all filled with the Holy Ghost:” “And so,” said he, “may all you be,
if it is not your own fault,”) and assisting him at the holy communion, (his
Curate being taken ill in the church,) I received the surprising news, that my
brother had found rest to his soul. His bodily strength returned also from that
hour. “Who is so great a God as our God?”
I preached at St. John’s, Wapping, at three, and at St.
Bennett’s, Paul’s-Wharf, in the evening At these churches, like. wise, I am to
preach no more. At St. Autholin’s I preached on the Thursday following. Monday,
Tuesday, and Wednesday, I had continual sorrow and heaviness in my heart: Something
of which I described, in the broken manner I was able, in the following letter
to a friend:
“O why is it, that so great, so wise, so holy a God will use
such an instrument as me! Lord, ‘let the dead bury their dead!’ But wilt thou
send the dead to raise the dead? Yea, thou sendest whom thou wilt send, and
showest mercy by whom thou wilt show mercy! Amen! Be it then according to thy
will! If thou speak the word, Judas shall cast out devils.
“I feel what you say, (though not enough,) for I am under
the same condemnation. I see that the whole law of God is holy, just, and good.
I know every thought, every temper of my soul, ought to bear God’s image and
superscription. But how am I fallen from the glory of God! I feel that ‘I am
sold under sin.’ I know, that I too deserve nothing but wrath, being full of
all abominations: And having no good thing in me, to atone for them, or to
remove the wrath of God. All my works, my righteousness, my prayers, need an
atonement for themselves. So that my mouth is stopped. I have nothing to plead.
God is holy, I am unholy. God is a consuming fire: I am altogether a sinner,
meet to be consumed.
“Yet I hear a voice (and is it not the voice of God?)
saying, ‘Believe, and thou shalt be saved. He that believeth is passed from
death unto life. God so loved the world that he gave his only-begotten Son,
that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting
life.’
“O let no one deceive us by vain words, as if we had already
attained this faith! (That is, the proper Christian faith.) By its fruits we
shall know. Do we already feel ‘peace with God,’ and ‘joy in the Holy Ghost?’
Does ‘his Spirit bear witness with our spirit, that we are the children of
God?’ Alas, with mine He does not. Nor, I fear, with yours. O thou Savior of
men, save us from trusting in anything but Thee! Draw us after Thee! Let us be
emptied of ourselves, and then fill us with all peace and joy in believing; and
let nothing separate us from thy love, in time or in eternity.”
What occurred on Wednesday, May 24th, I think best to relate
at large, after premising what may make it the better understood. Let him that
cannot receive it ask of the Father of lights, that He would give more light to
him and me.
1. I believe, till I was about ten years old I had not
sinned away that “washing of the Holy Ghost” which was given me in baptism;
having been strictly educated and carefully taught, that I could only be saved
“by universal obedience, by keeping all the commandments of God;” in the
meaning of which I was diligently instructed. And those instructions, so far as
they respected outward duties and sins, I gladly received, and often thought
of. But all that was said to me of inward obedience, or holiness, I neither
understood nor remembered. So that I was indeed as ignorant of the true meaning
of the Law, as I was of the Gospel of Christ.
2. The next six or seven years were spent at school; where,
outward restraints being removed, I was much more negligent than before, even
of outward duties, and almost continually guilty of outward sins, which I knew
to be such, though they were not scandalous in the eye of the world. However, I
still read the Scriptures, and said my prayers, morning and evening. And what I
now hoped to be saved by, was, 1. Not being so bad as other people. 2. Having
still a kindness for religion. And, 3. Reading the Bible, going to church, and
saying my prayers.
3. Being removed to the University for five years, I still
said my prayers both in public and in private, and read, with the Scriptures,
several other books of religion, especially comments on the New Testament. Yet
I had not all this while so much as a notion of inward holiness; nay, went on
habitually, and, for the most part, very contentedly, in some or other known sin:
Indeed, with some intermission and short struggles, especially before and after
the holy communion, which I was obliged to receive thrice a year. I cannot well
tell what I hoped to be saved by now, when I was continually sinning against
that little light I had; unless by those transient fits of what many Divines
taught me to call repentance.
4. When I was about twenty-two, my father pressed me to
enter into holy orders. At the same time, the providence of God directing me to
Kempis’s “Christian Pattern,” I began to see, that true religion was seated in
the heart, and that God’s law extended to all our thoughts as well as words and
actions. I was, however, very angry at Kempis, for being too strict; though I
read him only in Dean Stanhope’s translation. Yet I had frequently much
sensible comfort in reading him, such as I was an utter stranger to before: And
meeting likewise with a religious friend, which I never had till now, I began
to alter the whole form of my conversation, and to set in earnest upon a new
life. I set apart an hour or two a day for religious retirement. I communicated
every week. I watched against all sin, whether in word or deed. I began to aim
at, and pray for, inward holiness. So that now, “doing so much, and living so
good a life,” I doubted not but I was a good Christian.
5. Removing soon after to another College, I executed a
resolution which I was before convinced was of the utmost importance, - shaking
off at once all my trifling acquaintance. I began to see more and more the value
of time. I applied myself closer to study. I watched more carefully against
actual sins; I advised others to be religious, according to that scheme of
religion by which I modeled my own life. But meeting now with Mr. Law’s
“Christian Perfection” and “Serious Call,” although I was much offended at many
parts of both, yet they convinced me more than ever of the exceeding height and
breadth and depth of the law of God. The light flowed in so mightily upon my
soul, that every thing appeared in a new view. I cried to God for help, and
resolved not to prolong the time of obeying Him as I had never done before. And
by my continued endeavor to keep His whole law, inward and outward, to the
utmost of my power, I was persuaded that I should be accepted of Him, and that
I was even then in a state of salvation.
6. In 1730 I began visiting the prisons; assisting the poor
and sick in town; and doing what other good I could, by my presence, or my
little fortune, to the bodies and souls of all men. To this end I abridged
myself of all superfluities, and many that are called necessaries of life. I
soon became a by-word for so doing, and I rejoiced that my name was cast out as
evil. The next spring I began observing the Wednesday and Friday Fasts,
commonly observed in the ancient Church; tasting no food till three in the
afternoon. And now I knew not how to go any farther. I diligently strove
against all sin. I omitted no sort of self-denial which I thought lawful: I
carefully used, both in public and in private, all the means of grace at all
opportunities. I omitted no occasion of doing good: I for that reason suffered
evil. And all this I knew to he nothing, unless as it was directed toward
inward holiness. Accordingly this, the image of God, was what I aimed at in
all, by doing his will, not my own. Yet when, after continuing some years in
this course, I apprehended myself to be near death, I could not find that all
this gave me any comfort, or any assurance of acceptance with God. At this I
was then not a little surprised; not imagining I had been all this time
building on the sand, nor considering that “other foundation can no man lay,
than that which is laid” by God, “even Christ Jesus.”
7. Soon after, a contemplative man convinced me still more
than I was convinced before, that outward works are nothing, being alone; and
in several conversations instructed me, how to pursue inward holiness, or a
union of the soul with God. But even of his instructions (though I then
received them as the words of God) I cannot but now observe, 1. That he spoke
so incautiously against trusting in outward works, that he discouraged me from
doing them at all. 2. That he recommended (as it were, to supply what was
wanting in then) mental prayer, and the like exercises, as the most effectual
means of purifying the soul, and uniting it with God. Now these were, in truth,
as much my own works as visiting the sick or clothing the naked; and the union
with God thus pursued, was as really my own righteousness, as any I had before
pursued under another name.
8. In this refined way of trusting to my own works and my
own righteousness, (so zealously inculcated by the mystic writers,) I dragged
on heavily, finding no comfort or help therein, till the time of my leaving
England. On shipboard, however, I was again active in outward works; where it
pleased God of his free mercy to give me twenty-six of the Moravian brethren
for companions, who endeavored to show me “a more excellent way.” But I
understood it not at first. I was too learned and too wise. So that it seemed
foolishness unto me. And I continued preaching, and following after, and
trusting in, that righteousness whereby no flesh can be justified.
9. All the time I was at Savannah I was thus beating the
air. Being ignorant of the righteousness of Christ, which, by a living faith in
Him, bringeth salvation “to every one that believeth,” I sought to establish my
own righteousness; and so labored in the fire all my days. I was now properly
“under the law;” I knew that “the law” of God was “spiritual; I consented to it
that it was good.” Yea, “I delighted in it, after the inner man.” Yet was I
“carnal, sold under sin.” Everyday was I constrained to cry out, “What I do, I
allow not: For what I would, I do not; but what I hate, that I do. To will is “indeed”
present with me: But how to perform that which is good, I find not. For the
good which I would, I do not; but the evil which I would not, that I do. I find
a law, that when I would do good, evil is present with me:” Even “the law in my
members, warring against the law of my mind,” and still “bringing me into
captivity to the law of sin.”
10. In this vile, abject state of bondage to sin, I was
indeed fighting continually, but not conquering. Before, I had willingly served
sin; now it was unwillingly; but still I served it. I fell, and rose, and fell
again. Sometimes I was overcome, and in heaviness: Sometimes I overcame, and
was in joy. For as in the former state I had some foretastes of the terrors of
the law, so had I in this, of the comforts of the Gospel. During this whole
struggle between nature and grace, which had now continued above ten years, I
had many remarkable returns to prayer; especially when I was in trouble: I had
many sensible comforts; which are indeed no other than short anticipations of
the life of faith. But I was still “under the law,” not “under grace:” (The state most who are called Christians are content to live
and die in:) For I was only striving with, not freed from, sin. Neither
had I the witness of the Spirit with my spirit, and indeed could not; for I
“sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law.”
11. In my return to England, January, 1738, being in
imminent danger of death, and very uneasy on that account, I was strongly
convinced that the cause of that uneasiness was unbelief; and that the gaining
a true, living faith was the “one thing needful” for me. But still I fixed not
this faith on its right object: I meant only faith in God, not faith in or
through Christ. Again, I knew not that I was wholly void of this faith; but
only thought, I had not enough of it. So that when Peter Bohler, whom God
prepared for me as soon as I came to London, affirmed of true faith in Christ,
(which is but one,) that it had those two fruits inseparably attending it, “Dominion
over sin, and constant Peace from a sense of forgiveness,” I was quite amazed,
and looked upon it as a new Gospel. If this was so, it was clear I had not
faith. But I was not willing to be convinced of this. Therefore, I disputed
with all my might, and labored to prove that faith might be where these were
not; especially where the sense of forgiveness was not: For all the Scriptures
relating to this I had been long since taught to construe away; and to call all
Presbyterians who spoke otherwise. Besides, I well saw,
no one could, in the nature of things, have such a sense of forgiveness, and
not feel it. But I felt it not. If then there was no faith without this, all my
pretensions to faith dropped at once.
12. When I met Peter Bohler again, he consented to put the
dispute upon the issue which I desired, namely, Scripture and experience. I
first consulted the Scripture. But when I set aside the glosses of men, and
simply considered the words of God, comparing them together, endeavoring to
illustrate the obscure by the plainer passages; I found they all made against
me, and was forced to retreat to my last hold, “that experience would never
agree with the literal interpretation of those scriptures. Nor could I
therefore allow it to be true, till I found some living witnesses of it.” He
replied, he could show me such at any time; if I desired it, the next day. And
accordingly, the next day he came again with three others, all of whom
testified, of their own personal experience, that a true living faith in Christ
is inseparable from a sense of pardon for all past, and freedom from all
present, sins. They added with one mouth, that this faith was the gift, the
free gift of God; and that he would surely bestow it upon every soul who
earnestly and perseveringly sought it. I was now thoroughly convinced; and, by
the grace of God, I resolved to seek it unto the end, 1. By absolutely
renouncing all dependence, in whole or in part, upon my own works or
righteousness; on which I had really grounded my hope of salvation though I
knew it not, from my youth up. 2. By adding to the constant use of all the
other means of grace, continual prayer for this very thing, justifying, saving
faith, a full reliance on the blood of Christ shed for me; a trust in Him, as
my Christ, as my sole justification, sanctification, and redemption.
13. I continued thus to seek it, (though with strange
indifference, dullness, and coldness, and unusually frequent relapses into
sin,) till Wednesday, May 24. I think it was about five this morning, that I
opened my Testament on those words, “There are given unto us exceeding great
and precious promises, even that ye should be partakers of the divine nature.”
(2 Peter 1:4.) Just as I went out, I opened it again on those words, “Thou art
not far from the kingdom of God.” In the afternoon I was asked to go to St.
Paul’s. The anthem was, “Out of the deep have I called unto thee, O Lord: Lord,
hear my voice. O let thine ears consider well the voice of my complaint. If
thou, Lord, wilt be extreme to mark what is done amiss, O Lord, who may abide
it? For there is mercy with thee; therefore shalt thou be feared. O Israel,
trust in the Lord: For with the Lord there is mercy, and with him is plenteous
redemption. And He shall redeem Israel from all his sins.”
14. In the evening I went very unwillingly to a society in
Aldersgate-Street, where one was reading Luther’s preface to the Epistle to the
Romans. About a quarter before nine, while he was describing the change which
God works in the heart through faith in Christ, I felt my heart strangely
warmed. I felt I did trust in Christ, Christ alone for salvation: And an
assurance was given me, that he had taken away my sins, even mine, and saved me
from the law of sin and death.
15. I began to pray with all my might for those who had in a
more especial manner despitefully used me and persecuted me. I then testified
openly to all there, what I now first felt in my heart. But it was not long
before the enemy suggested, “This cannot be faith; for where is thy joy?” Then
was I taught, that peace and victory over sin are essential to faith in the
Captain of our salvation: But that, as to the transports of joy that usually
attend the beginning of it, especially in those who have mourned deeply, God
sometimes giveth, sometimes with holdeth them, according to the counsels of his
own will.
16. After my return home, I was much buffeted with
temptations; but cried out, and they fled away. They returned again and again.
I as often lifted up my eyes, and He “sent me help from his holy place.” And
herein I found the difference between this and my former state chiefly
consisted. I was striving, yea, fighting with all my might under the law, as
well as under grace. But then I was sometimes, if not often, conquered; now, I
was always conqueror.
17. May 25, 1738: The moment I awaked, “Jesus, Master,” was
in my heart and in my mouth; and I found all my strength lay in keeping my eye
fixed upon him, and my soul waiting on him continually. Being again at St.
Paul’s in the afternoon, I could taste the good word of God in the anthem,
which began, “My song shall be always of the loving kindness of the Lord: With
my mouth will I ever be showing forth thy truth from one generation to
another.” Yet the enemy injected a fear, “If thou dost believe, why is there
not a more sensible change?” I answered, (yet not I,) “That I know not. But
this I know, I have ‘now peace with God.’ And I sin not today, and Jesus my
Master has forbid me to take thought for the morrow.”
18. “But is not any sort of fear,” continued the tempter, “a
proof that thou dost not believe?” I desired my Master to answer for me; and
opened his Book upon those words of St. Paul, “Without were fightings, within
were fears.” Then, inferred I, well may fears be within me; but I must go on,
and tread them under my feet.
May 26, 1738: My soul continued in peace, but yet in
heaviness because of manifold temptations. I asked Mr. Telchig, the Moravian,
what to do. He said, “You must not fight with them, as you did before, but flee
from them the moment they appear, and take shelter in the wounds of Jesus.” The
same I learned also from the afternoon anthem, which was, “My soul truly
waiteth still upon God: For of Him cometh my salvation; He verily is my
strength and my salvation, He is my defense, so that I shall not greatly fall.
O put your trust in Him always, ye people; pour out your hearts before Him; for
God is our hope.”
May 27, 1738: Believing one reason of my want of joy was
want of time for prayer, I resolved to do no business till I went to church in
the morning, but to continue pouring out my heart before Him. And this day my
spirit was enlarged; so that though I was now also assaulted by many
temptations, I was more than conqueror, gaining more power thereby to trust and
to rejoice in God my Savior.
May 28, 1738: I waked in peace, but not in joy. In the
same even, quiet state I was till the evening, when I was roughly attacked in a
large company as an enthusiast, a seducer, and a setter-forth of new doctrines.
By the blessing of God, I was not moved to anger, but after a calm and short
reply went away; though not with so tender a concern as was due to those who
were seeking death in the error of their life. This day I preached in the
morning at St. George’s, Bloomsbury, on, “This is the victory that overcometh
the world, even our faith;” and in the afternoon at the chapel in Long-Acre, on
God’s justifying the ungodly; - the last time (I understand) I am to preach at
either. “Not as I will, but as Thou wilt.”
May 29, 1738: I set out for Dummer with Mr. Wolf, one of the
first-fruits of Peter Bohler’s ministry in England. I was much strengthened by
the grace of God in him: Yet was his state so far above mine, that I was often
tempted to doubt whether we had one faith. But, without much reasoning about
it, I holden here: “Though his be strong and mine weak,
yet that God hath given some degree of faith even to me, I know by its fruits.
For I have constant peace; - not one uneasy thought. And I have freedom from
sin; - not one unholy desire.”
Saturday, November 8, 2014
Conditional salvation
This is John Wesley's holistic interpretation of God's
message to humanity as revealed in the old and new testaments:
"We have
received it as a maxim, that 'a man is to do nothing in order to
justification.' Nothing can be more false. Whoever desires to find favour with
God,—should 'cease from evil, and learn to do well.' Whoever repents, should do
'works meet for repentance.' And if this is not in order to find favor what
does he do them for?
Review the whole affair.
1. Who of us is now accepted of God? He that now believes in
Christ, with a loving, obedient heart.
2. But who among those who never heard of Christ? He that
feareth God, and worketh righteousness according to the light he
has.
3. Is this the same with ' he that is sincere?' Nearly, if
not quite.
4. Is not this 'salvation by works?' Not by the merit of
works, but by works as a condition."
Saturday, March 22, 2014
What is saving faith?
The following is an excerpt from John Wesley's sermon
entitled "On Faith" in which he describes saving faith. I do not think a more accurate representation of the Bible's message exists in all of man-made literature.
10. But what is the faith which is properly saving; which
brings eternal salvation to all those that keep it to the end? It is such a
divine conviction of God, and the things of God, as, even in its infant state,
enables every one that possesses it to “fear God and work righteousness.” And
whosoever, in every nation, believes thus far, the Apostle declares, is it
accepted of him.” He actually is, at that very moment, in a state of
acceptance. But he is at present only a servant of God, not properly a son.
Meantime, let it be well observed, that “the wrath of God” no longer “abideth
on him.”
11. Indeed, nearly fifty years ago, when the Preachers,
commonly called Methodists, began to preach that grand scriptural doctrine,
salvation by faith, they were not sufficiently apprised of the difference
between a servant and a child of God. They did not clearly understand, that
even one “who feareth God, and worketh righteousness, is accepted of him.” In
consequence of this, they were apt to make sad the hearts of those whom God had
not made sad. For they frequently asked those who feared God, “Do you know that
your sins are forgiven?” And upon their answering, “No,” immediately replied,
“Then you are a child of the devil.” No; that does not follow. It might have
been said, (and it is all that can be said with propriety,) “Hitherto you are
only a servant, you are not a child of God. You have already great reason to
praise God that he has called you to his honorable service. Fear not. Continue
crying unto him, ‘and you shall see greater things than these.’”
12. And, indeed, unless the servants of God halt by the way,
they will receive the adoption of sons. They will receive the faith of the
children of God, by his revealing his only begotten Son in their hearts. Thus,
the faith of a child is, properly and directly, a divine conviction, whereby
every child of God is enabled to testify, “The life that I now live, I live by
faith in the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.” And whosoever
hath this, the Spirit of God witnesseth with his spirit, that he is a child of
God. So the Apostle writes to the Galatians: “Ye are the sons of God by faith.
And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your
hearts, crying, Abba, Father;” that is, giving you a childlike confidence in
him, together. With a kind affection toward him. This then it is, that (if St.
Paul was taught of God, and wrote at, he was moved by the Holy Ghost) properly
constitutes the difference between a servant of God, and a child of God. “He
that believeth,” as a child of God, “hath the witness in himself.” This the
servant hath not. Yet let no man discourage him; rather, lovingly exhort him to
expect it every moment.
13. It is easy to observe, that all the sorts of faith which
we can conceive are reducible to one or other of the preceding. But let us
covet the best gifts, and follow the most excellent way. There is no reason why
you should be satisfied with the faith of a Materialist, a Heathen, or a Deist,
nor, indeed, with that of a servant. I do not know that God requires it at your
hands. Indeed, if you have received this, you ought not to cast it away; you
ought not in anywise to undervalue it; but to be truly thankful for it. Yet, in
the meantime, beware how you rest here: Press on till you receive the Spirit of
adoption: Rest not, till that Spirit clearly witnesses with your spirit, that
you are a child of God." ~ John Wesley
The entire sermon may be found at the following link:
http://wesley.nnu.edu/.../the.../sermon-106-on-faith/
Sunday, November 17, 2013
Spurgeon’s new birth ends five years of “most fearful distress”
"Can you not remember, dearly-beloved, that day of days, that best and brightest of hours, when first you saw the Lord, lost your burden, received the roll of promise, rejoiced in full salvation, and went on your way in peace? My soul can never forget that day . . . [I had been about five years in the most fearful distress in mind, as a lad. If any human being felt more of the terror of God's law, I can indeed pity and sympathize with him. Bunyan's Grace Abounding contains, in the main, my history. Some abysses he went into I never trod; but some into which I plunged he seems to have never known] . . . Dying, all but dead, diseased, pained, chained, scourged, bound in fetters of iron, in darkness and the shadow of death, Jesus appeared unto me. My eyes looked to Him; the disease was healed, the pains removed, chains were snapped, prison doors were opened, darkness gave place to light. What delight filled my soul!—what mirth, what ecstasy, what sound of music and dancing, what soarings towards Heaven, what heights and depths of ineffable delight! Scarcely ever since then have I known joys which surpassed the rapture of that first hour.
"I can testify that the joy of that day was utterly indescribable. I could have leaped, I could have danced; there was no expression, however fanatical, which would have been out of keeping with the joy of my spirit at that hour . . . My spirit saw its chains broken to pieces, I felt that I was an emancipated soul, an heir of Heaven, a forgiven one, accepted in Christ Jesus, plucked out of the miry clay and out of the horrible pit, with my feet set upon a rock, and my goings established. I thought I could dance all the way home. I could understand what John Bunyan meant, when he declared he wanted to tell the crows on the ploughed land all about his conversion. He was too full to hold, he felt he must tell somebody. Between half-past ten o'clock, when I entered that chapel, and half-past twelve o'clock, when I was back again at home, what a change had taken place in me!
"I had passed from darkness into marvelous light, from death to life. Simply by looking to Jesus, I had been delivered from despair, and I was brought into such a joyous state of mind that, when they saw me at home, they said to me, "Something wonderful has happened to you;" and I was eager to tell them all about it . . . the moment before, there was none more wretched than I was, so, within that second, there was none more joyous. It took no longer time than does the lightning-flash; it was done, and never has it been undone . . . the bruises that my soul had suffered were healed, the gaping wounds were cured, the broken bones rejoiced, the rags that had covered me were all removed, my spirit was white as the spotless snows of the far-off North; I had melody within my spirit, for I was saved, washed, cleansed, forgiven, through Him that did hang upon the tree." ~ Charles H. Spurgeon
Charles H. Spurgeon was born at Essex, England, June 19, 1834; was converted on December 15, 1850; preached his first sermon in 1851 at age 16; became a pastor in 1852; published more than 1900 sermons during his lifetime; and died in 1892.
"I can testify that the joy of that day was utterly indescribable. I could have leaped, I could have danced; there was no expression, however fanatical, which would have been out of keeping with the joy of my spirit at that hour . . . My spirit saw its chains broken to pieces, I felt that I was an emancipated soul, an heir of Heaven, a forgiven one, accepted in Christ Jesus, plucked out of the miry clay and out of the horrible pit, with my feet set upon a rock, and my goings established. I thought I could dance all the way home. I could understand what John Bunyan meant, when he declared he wanted to tell the crows on the ploughed land all about his conversion. He was too full to hold, he felt he must tell somebody. Between half-past ten o'clock, when I entered that chapel, and half-past twelve o'clock, when I was back again at home, what a change had taken place in me!
"I had passed from darkness into marvelous light, from death to life. Simply by looking to Jesus, I had been delivered from despair, and I was brought into such a joyous state of mind that, when they saw me at home, they said to me, "Something wonderful has happened to you;" and I was eager to tell them all about it . . . the moment before, there was none more wretched than I was, so, within that second, there was none more joyous. It took no longer time than does the lightning-flash; it was done, and never has it been undone . . . the bruises that my soul had suffered were healed, the gaping wounds were cured, the broken bones rejoiced, the rags that had covered me were all removed, my spirit was white as the spotless snows of the far-off North; I had melody within my spirit, for I was saved, washed, cleansed, forgiven, through Him that did hang upon the tree." ~ Charles H. Spurgeon
Charles H. Spurgeon was born at Essex, England, June 19, 1834; was converted on December 15, 1850; preached his first sermon in 1851 at age 16; became a pastor in 1852; published more than 1900 sermons during his lifetime; and died in 1892.
Sunday, June 24, 2012
Equating saving faith with initial sanctification
In recent years, I have learned that it is a mistake to equate "saving faith" with "initial sanctification" as they are not necessarily experienced simultaneously. In fact, I believe that this is more often the case than not. In my lifetime, I have experienced two different church cultures where this mistake was paramount. In my experience, the teaching that "saving faith" cannot exist without "initial sanctification" inevitably leads to either despair or presumption depending on the particular emphasis of the church culture. In church cultures that emphasize the power of initial sanctification, seekers fight the demon of despair and have difficulty moving forward in faith. In church cultures that emphasize the power of saving faith, seekers think they are candidates for entire sanctification when it is initial sanctification that they actually need. Below is an example of early Methodist theology that explores the ramifications of equating "saving faith" with "initial sanctification":
“Are there not many pious and judicious ministers in the Churches of England and Scotland, as well as among the dissenters, who dare not countenance the present revival of the power of godliness, chiefly because they hear us sometimes unguardedly assert that none have any faith but such as have the faith of assurance; and that the wrath of God actually abides on all those who have not that faith? If we warily allowed the faith of the inferior dispensations, which such divines clearly see in the Scriptures, and feel in themselves; would not their prejudices be softened, and their minds prepared to receive what we advance in defence of the faith of assurance?”
“. . . You are afraid that the doctrine of this Essay will make 'seekers rest in Laodicean lukewarmness;' but permit me to observe that the seekers you speak of are either forward hypocrites, or sincere penitents. If they are forward hypocrites, preaching to them the faith of assurance will never make them either humble or sincere. On the contrary, they will probably catch . . . at an assurance of their own making; and so they will profess to have the faith for which you contend, when in fact they have only the name and notion of it. The religious world swarms with instances of this kind."
“If, on the other hand, the seekers for whom you seem concerned are sincere penitents; far from being hurt, they will be greatly benefited by our doctrine: for it will at once keep them from chilling, despairing fears, and from false, Crispian [Antinomian] comforts; the two opposite extremes into which upright, unwary mourners are most apt to run. Thus our doctrine, instead of being dangerous to sincere seekers, will prove a Scriptural clue, in following which they will happily avoid the gloomy haunts of Pharisaic despair, and the enchanted ground of Antinomian presumption." ~ John Fletcher of Madeley
“Are there not many pious and judicious ministers in the Churches of England and Scotland, as well as among the dissenters, who dare not countenance the present revival of the power of godliness, chiefly because they hear us sometimes unguardedly assert that none have any faith but such as have the faith of assurance; and that the wrath of God actually abides on all those who have not that faith? If we warily allowed the faith of the inferior dispensations, which such divines clearly see in the Scriptures, and feel in themselves; would not their prejudices be softened, and their minds prepared to receive what we advance in defence of the faith of assurance?”
“. . . You are afraid that the doctrine of this Essay will make 'seekers rest in Laodicean lukewarmness;' but permit me to observe that the seekers you speak of are either forward hypocrites, or sincere penitents. If they are forward hypocrites, preaching to them the faith of assurance will never make them either humble or sincere. On the contrary, they will probably catch . . . at an assurance of their own making; and so they will profess to have the faith for which you contend, when in fact they have only the name and notion of it. The religious world swarms with instances of this kind."
“If, on the other hand, the seekers for whom you seem concerned are sincere penitents; far from being hurt, they will be greatly benefited by our doctrine: for it will at once keep them from chilling, despairing fears, and from false, Crispian [Antinomian] comforts; the two opposite extremes into which upright, unwary mourners are most apt to run. Thus our doctrine, instead of being dangerous to sincere seekers, will prove a Scriptural clue, in following which they will happily avoid the gloomy haunts of Pharisaic despair, and the enchanted ground of Antinomian presumption." ~ John Fletcher of Madeley
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Intellectual honesty and spiritual reality
~ In 1985 Thomas R. Albin first published his research at Cambridge University. Albin did a study of the Wesleyan Revival and put together an amazing array of statistics on the way God worked in the lives of those touched by the Wesleys' ministry. More recently Albin was interviewed in the August 2003 issue of Christianity Today. Using mostly autobiographical accounts from the Arminian Magazine and other early sources, Albin's study used the testimony of 555 Methodist converts from the years 1725‑1790.
His information follows the early Methodist tendency to interpret their spiritual journey around three definite stages: work of prevenient grace leading to awakening and conviction for sin, the experience of justification and the new birth and the experience of entire sanctification. Most of the converts came from some type of church background with few being saved out "of the rough." Of those who included information on their childhood home, 6.2% came from "active irreligious" or "unconcerned or inactive homes." This seems to indicate that the Wesleyan revival was exactly that - a reviving of spiritual life and fervor among those who had some degree of religious training.
The average age of one's awakening was 21 years of age with a time lapse of more than two years between their awakening and new birth experience. "This fact suggests that the evangelical conversion for early Methodism was a slow process involving significant thought and reflection." One has to wonder if our American drive to push people on to an experience has not come back to haunt us . . . Most of the converts were alone when they experienced the new birth. When those who were in a small group are added more than two‑thirds are accounted for. Most of those who were alone were in their own room or home when the blessing came.
The time lapse between the experience of the new birth and entire sanctification was nearly six years on average. Of the 131 cases that experienced this, one‑half were alone. The "single most frequent event," for this blessing was: the deathbed (22.1%), while different types of prayer make up the largest general category (33.2%). Sixteen persons received it during preaching, thirteen in spiritual conversation and eight while going about the routines of life. Perhaps it was Wesley's emphasis to, "expect it every moment," that contributed to such diverse settings of the experience. ~ Mark Horton
His information follows the early Methodist tendency to interpret their spiritual journey around three definite stages: work of prevenient grace leading to awakening and conviction for sin, the experience of justification and the new birth and the experience of entire sanctification. Most of the converts came from some type of church background with few being saved out "of the rough." Of those who included information on their childhood home, 6.2% came from "active irreligious" or "unconcerned or inactive homes." This seems to indicate that the Wesleyan revival was exactly that - a reviving of spiritual life and fervor among those who had some degree of religious training.
The average age of one's awakening was 21 years of age with a time lapse of more than two years between their awakening and new birth experience. "This fact suggests that the evangelical conversion for early Methodism was a slow process involving significant thought and reflection." One has to wonder if our American drive to push people on to an experience has not come back to haunt us . . . Most of the converts were alone when they experienced the new birth. When those who were in a small group are added more than two‑thirds are accounted for. Most of those who were alone were in their own room or home when the blessing came.
The time lapse between the experience of the new birth and entire sanctification was nearly six years on average. Of the 131 cases that experienced this, one‑half were alone. The "single most frequent event," for this blessing was: the deathbed (22.1%), while different types of prayer make up the largest general category (33.2%). Sixteen persons received it during preaching, thirteen in spiritual conversation and eight while going about the routines of life. Perhaps it was Wesley's emphasis to, "expect it every moment," that contributed to such diverse settings of the experience. ~ Mark Horton
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)